Main content

Date created: | Last Updated:


Creating DOI. Please wait...

Create DOI

Category: Project

Description: Systematic Reviews and meta-analyses have been on top of the hierarchy for evidence synthesis in medicine. Statistical methods for analysis of meta-analysis have often been through the use of a classical framework. Nonetheless here we showcase an alternative Bayesian model averaging approach through a large scale re-analysis of continuous outcome meta-analyses from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Moreover, different vague and informed priors for the effect size parameter δ and the between-study variance parameter τ are proposed and tested by means of an hold-out validation strategy. In addition, this proposal presents a design for conducting a sensitivity analysis for comparing the Bayesian model averaging methods against traditional methods and measures. Overall, it is proposed to entertain the same methods and models on a validation set to showcase the potential use of a Bayesian model averaging approach.


Loading files...


Recent Activity

Loading logs...

OSF does not support the use of Internet Explorer. For optimal performance, please switch to another browser.
This website relies on cookies to help provide a better user experience. By clicking Accept or continuing to use the site, you agree. For more information, see our Privacy Policy and information on cookie use.

Start managing your projects on the OSF today.

Free and easy to use, the Open Science Framework supports the entire research lifecycle: planning, execution, reporting, archiving, and discovery.