A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON HUBBLE'S LAW THROUGH A FOUR-DIMENSIONAL SPATIAL MODEL **Speculative Framework and Cosmological Context** This theoretical exploration ([here is an introduction][1]) focuses on Galactic Recession, though the cosmological nature of the model necessitates engagement with broader themes such as dark matter dynamics [*], Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) anisotropies, and related phenomena. These interdisciplinary connections were introduced to rigorously test whether the proposed framework, under its foundational hypotheses, would lead to physically or observationally inconsistent scenarios. To address these challenges, the model incorporates necessary assumptions that remain purely conjectural (see for example the paragraph: 4-SPHERE IN A NUTSHELL: THE METRIC TENSOR). Nevertheless, the cornerstone of this speculation lies in its alignment with Hubble’s Law and the empirical validation of stellar distance measurements. These elements serve as critical anchors to ensure consistency with established observational constraints. [*] - For further information on Dark Matter and Dark Energy, please refer to my brief dissertation available here: [[10.5281/zenodo.15220590] - Reevaluating the Necessity of Dark Matter and Dark Energy within Cosmological Models](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15220590). **Request for help from astronomers** Here to validate my findings, I compare luminosity distances calculated from redshift (z) and distance modulus (μ). For my analysis, I believe it is critical to retain the approach outlined in <a href="https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993ApJ...413L.105P/abstract" target="_blank">Astrophysical Journal Letters v.413, p.L105 - The Absolute Magnitudes of Type IA Supernovae</a>. This method is not only accessible due to its reliance on widely available computational tools but, more importantly, it avoids the need for K-corrections during the initial sample selection phase. This ensures that results remain independent of any assumed cosmological model. To conduct further validations, I need to explore the data from JWST, particularly its redshifted filters. For example, for a supernova at z = 1.0, the B-band (≈450 nm) would be redshifted to 900 nm, meaning I should use the F090W filter. The challenge now is finding the necessary observational data that describe the explosion and decay phases of some supernova, ideally including comparison stars. The V-band should also be useful for this analysis. Searching on MAST (Mikulski Archive for Space Telescopes) becomes extremely challenging when formulating a generic query without knowing the target name (I struggled to identify a suitable supernova for my purposes). **So, I’d like to ask astronomers: Have JWST observations been conducted to capture the decay curves of Type Ia supernovae, specifically starting no later than maximum brightness and extending for at least 20 days post-maximum?** Key questions: 1. Is this method for deriving absolute magnitudes still valid, or is it considered outdated? 2. Can such data (light curves meeting the criteria above) be found in publicly accessible databases like MAST or others? How can I find them? **Invitation for Feedback** I would love to hear your thoughts. Instead of reading the full essay [in the Files tab][2], I recommend checking out the short paragraphs following the Abstract, marked as "4-SPHERE IN A NUTSHELL," which provide a concise summary of the key ideas. However, the critical point concerns the validation of stellar distances, which is described in: https://osf.io/y736c/wiki/Supernova%20validation%20in%204-Sphere/ Error reports, constructive criticism, and scholarly dialogue are warmly encouraged. Please direct inquiries to the email address provided in the associated PDF document. [Project history](https://vixra.org/author/claudio_marchesan) [1]: https://vixra.org/abs/2504.0144 [2]: https://osf.io/y736c/files/osfstorage