In his influential book *The Mismeasure of Man* (1981, revised and republished in 1996), Stephen Jay Gould launched an attack on the field of differential psychology and on intelligence testing in particular. Throughout the book, One common theme of the book is that Gould criticizes psychologists for letting their ideology distort their science. Criticisms of Gould's book are common (e.g., Herrnstein & Murray, 1996; Reeve, 2008). One longstanding criticism is that Gould himself is guilty of the very sin that he accuses psychologists of (Jensen, 1982; Rushton, 1997; Sanders, 1985). Indeed, evidence has emerged that Gould manipulated data to support his political and social beliefs (Lewis, 2011). The purpose of this replication is to examine another potential area where Gould could have manipulated data to support his thesis. This is in his administration of the Army Beta intelligence test to 53 college students, which is described in *The Mismeasure of Man* (Gould, 1981, pp. 204-214; Gould, 1996, pp. 234-244). Of the 7 subtests on the Army Beta, Gould (1981, p. 212) reported that only 22.6% to 92.5% of examinees finished a test (with a median percentage of 75.5%). Gould also claims that his Harvard undergraduate course on "biology as a social weapon," 58.5% scored as "A" (the highest of the classifications on the Army Beta), 30.2% scored as "B" (second highest classification), and 11.3% scored as "C." My hypothesis in this replication is that a larger percentage of undergraduates in my sample will complete the Army Beta tests. I also predict that a larger percentage will score in the "A" and "B" range of the Army Beta. Finally, in contrast to Gould's assertion that it is "ludicrous to believe that Beta measured any internal state deserving the label intelligence" (Gould, 1981, p. 210), I hypothesize that Army Beta scores will correlate positively with examinees' college admission test scores and college grade point average.