Main content

Home

Menu

Loading wiki pages...

View
Wiki Version:
Expectations ------------ Since in the original study by Sripada et al. a drug was administered to one half of the participants, I find it very hard to use their reported effect sizes as a reliable estimate for this replication project. My perspective was that the RRR simply employs some of their methods without trying to replicate their specific study. The meta-analytical effect size reported by Hagger et al. (2010) seems like a reasonable estimate, although Carter and McCullough (2014) raised some good points as well. Therefore, I expect the effect size to be somewhat lower than the one reported by Hagger et al. Generally speaking, I am pretty much agnostic as to whether the mechanisms named “ego depletion” exists or not. However, I the RRR will yield findings on which types of task can cause deterioration of performance in other types of tasks -- which is of great interest to me as someone studying human learning.
OSF does not support the use of Internet Explorer. For optimal performance, please switch to another browser.
Accept
This website relies on cookies to help provide a better user experience. By clicking Accept or continuing to use the site, you agree. For more information, see our Privacy Policy and information on cookie use.
Accept
×

Start managing your projects on the OSF today.

Free and easy to use, the Open Science Framework supports the entire research lifecycle: planning, execution, reporting, archiving, and discovery.