Main content

Files | Discussion Wiki | Discussion | Discussion
default Loading...

Home

Menu

Loading wiki pages...

View
Wiki Version:
Semantic theories claim that when a sentence contains two epistemic modals, one modal is within the scope of the other. However, it is possible that, in casual conversation, the scope of nested modals may only be partially processed, and thus, changing the order of the modals might not change interlocutors’ interpretations. This study used a probability judgment test to investigate people’s interpretations of nested epistemic expressions. Results showed that although nested modals yielded probability estimates between values for modals presented individually, the effect of word order was not observed, thus not supporting the scope account of the nested epistemic expressions.
OSF does not support the use of Internet Explorer. For optimal performance, please switch to another browser.
Accept
This website relies on cookies to help provide a better user experience. By clicking Accept or continuing to use the site, you agree. For more information, see our Privacy Policy and information on cookie use.
Accept
×

Start managing your projects on the OSF today.

Free and easy to use, the Open Science Framework supports the entire research lifecycle: planning, execution, reporting, archiving, and discovery.