Main content

Files | Discussion Wiki | Discussion | Discussion
default Loading...

Home

Menu

Loading wiki pages...

View
Wiki Version:
The Principle of Dependency Length Minimization (DLM) predicts that the overall or average distance between syntactic heads and their dependents tends to be minimized. Here we ask two questions: (i) are shorter dependencies preferred in syntactic alternations with flexible orderings across languages? (ii) how does the extent of DLM in ordering preferences vary among languages with different syntactic characteristics? Leveraging large-scale multilingual corpora, we use double PP ordering typology as the test bed (*Zoey **presented** [ **on** something linguistics ] [ **to** her professors and colleagues ]* vs. *Zoey **presented** [ **to** her professors and colleagues ] [ **on** something linguistics ]*) and show a crosslinguistic tendency for DLM. Though the extent of DLM is much weaker in general in preverbal domains compared to that in postverbal domains. **Any comments, questions and criticism are more than welcome! Come chat with me on Google hangout (yiliu@ucdavis.edu) if you'd like.**
OSF does not support the use of Internet Explorer. For optimal performance, please switch to another browser.
Accept
This website relies on cookies to help provide a better user experience. By clicking Accept or continuing to use the site, you agree. For more information, see our Privacy Policy and information on cookie use.
Accept
×

Start managing your projects on the OSF today.

Free and easy to use, the Open Science Framework supports the entire research lifecycle: planning, execution, reporting, archiving, and discovery.