*(same for Study 1a and Study 1b with an exception that in Study 1b, we will exclude participants that will spend less than 15 seconds on one or more of the dilemmas)*<br> The design of the present study will enable us to analyze the differences between conditions both for each dilemma separately (i.e. between-subjects) and for all dilemmas together (i.e. within-subjects). While the within-subject approach may lead to higher statistical power, based on previous study (Di Nucci, 2013) we expect to find some order effects. The between-subject approach may therefore lead to theoretically cleaner results. While the difference between conditions is of the main interest in the present study, we will also explore possible effects of the order of presentation of the conditions. *Study 2* Data will be analyzed using 2 (self / other) x 2 (1st / 3rd point of view) x 4 (question type right / wrong / should / should not) ANOVA with (dis)agreement expressed on a six-point Likert scale as the dependent variable. *[note: We deviated from the pre-registered analysis plan for Study 2. We decomposed the 4-level factor into seperate 2 (normative / prescriptive) x 2 (positive / negative frame) factors in order to facilitate comparison of Study 2 with Study 1a and 1b.]* **References** Di Nucci, E. (2013). Self-Sacrifice and the Trolley Problem. *Philosophical Psychology, 26*, 662-672.