Main content

Home

Menu

View
Wiki Version:
t-statistic maps in .nii format. Individual maps for each task and each participant in folder for that task. The averages were originally computed for a 2-group contrast between typical vs atypical (following Bruckert's original thesis), but the paper reports a 3-group comparison between left-lateralised, right-lateralised, and bilateral. This distinction is based on Bruckert's original classification. The bilateral group have LI on Word Generation measured by fTCD where the 95% CI spans zero. The left- and right-lateralised groups have left- or right-biased Word Generation measured by fTCD where the 95% CI does not include zero. These averages were used for Figures 6 and 13.
OSF does not support the use of Internet Explorer. For optimal performance, please switch to another browser.
Accept
This website relies on cookies to help provide a better user experience. By clicking Accept or continuing to use the site, you agree. For more information, see our Privacy Policy and information on cookie use.
Accept
×

Start managing your projects on the OSF today.

Free and easy to use, the Open Science Framework supports the entire research lifecycle: planning, execution, reporting, archiving, and discovery.

Copyright © 2011-2025 Center for Open Science | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Status | API
TOP Guidelines | Reproducibility Project: Psychology | Reproducibility Project: Cancer Biology