Initial Discussion Points: 1. Important to avoid special issues purely from the "perpetrator" perspective. Need for special issues focused on studies/papers that have diverse and representative samples. 2. Finding a good and welcoming home for such a special issues. AMPPS was suggested. 3. An interesting/illuminating issue could focus on studies to highlight just how WEIRD WEIRD participants are. (Yuichi's self-proclaimed "half baked" idea. 4. A call could highlight substantial English language assistance for contributing researchers from underrepersented (in most psych literature) geographical areas. 5. Provide materials to ease special issue proposals for researchers interested in starting one, but who lacks the experience/confidence to propose one. This could be a tutorial paper that could open a special issue. 6. Registered Reports? Longer time frame expected for collection? Allows for low power studies to be informative if later combined with other small RRs into meta analyses. Question: Would this take A TON of labs?? 7. A special issue focused on RRs like in #6. 8. Concerns about special issues as a "band aid" for needs not met in "standard" issues. 9. Moin comment: "Wait a second, what is a hard-to-reach population?" 10.