Main content

Date created: | Last Updated:

: DOI | ARK

Creating DOI. Please wait...

Create DOI

Category: Project

Description: The key questions guiding these living rapid reviews are: KQ1: What is the effectiveness of different COVID-19 rapid testing strategies* including self-administered versus supervised testing, and different testing frequencies (e.g., one off compared to serial testing at different intervals for different lengths of time) at detecting infectiousness or reducing transmission? KQ2: What is the risk of COVID-19 transmission associated with different activities (e.g., dining, exercising etc.) or settings (e.g., educational, hospitality etc.) and what factors contribute to risk (e.g., type of contact, number of contacts, time within the risk environment)? KQ3: How does transmission risk of common activities alter with background population prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 and population vaccine coverage? *This review does not focus on the comparison of rapid antigen detection tests with a reference standard reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test or the choice of individual tests. This research was funded by the Health Research Board through Evidence Synthesis Ireland [HRB Grant Number CBES-2018-001]. The living rapid reviews were also funded by The Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research Evidence Alliance (SPOR EA) which is supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) under the Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research (SPOR) initiative.

License: CC-By Attribution 4.0 International

Wiki

Add important information, links, or images here to describe your project.

Files

Loading files...

Citation

Components

Expedited Draft Summaries

These brief expedited reports are preliminary results from the living rapid reviews submitted to the Rapid Testing Expert Advisory Group, Ireland. The...

Recent Activity

Loading logs...

Tags

Recent Activity

Loading logs...