Main content

Affiliated institutions: Arizona State University

Date created: | Last Updated:


Creating DOI. Please wait...

Create DOI

Category: Project

Description: We offer a peer-reviewed, published academic journal article as well as supplementary file to be used to implement the best practices in the review while evaluating the quality and rigor of a forensic psychological assessment. Paper Abstract: We review the state of forensic mental health assessment. The field is in much better shape than in the past; however, significant problems of quality remain, with much room for improvement. We provide an overview of forensic psychology’s history and discuss its possible future, with multiple audiences in mind. We distill decades of scholarship from and about fundamental basic science and forensic science, clinical and forensic psychology, and the law of expert evidence into eight best practices for the validity of a forensic psychological assessment. We argue these best practices should apply when a psychological assessment relies on the norms, values, and esteem of science to inform legal processes. The eight key considerations include (a) foundational validity of the assessment; (b) validity of the assessment as applied; (c) management and mitigation of bias; (d) attention to quality assurance; (e) appropriate communication of data, results, and opinions; (f) explicit consideration of limitations and assumptions; (g) weighing of alternative views or disagreements; and (h) adherence with ethical obligations, professional guidelines, codes of conduct, and rules of evidence.

License: CC-By Attribution 4.0 International


Add important information, links, or images here to describe your project.


Loading files...



Report and Expert Testimony on rigorous forensic psychological assessment practices to the Joint Federal/Provincial Commission into the April 2020 Nova Scotia Mass Casualty

We relied on the principles of open science in the preparation of this report. Open science aims to increase the openness, integrity and reproducibil...

Recent Activity

Loading logs...

How to Cross-Examine the Expert Testimony of a Psychologist

We have written this guide in response to concerns lawyers have voiced about their knowledge of, and ability to, explore the underlying quality of psy...

Recent Activity

Loading logs...


Recent Activity

Loading logs...

OSF does not support the use of Internet Explorer. For optimal performance, please switch to another browser.
This website relies on cookies to help provide a better user experience. By clicking Accept or continuing to use the site, you agree. For more information, see our Privacy Policy and information on cookie use.

Start managing your projects on the OSF today.

Free and easy to use, the Open Science Framework supports the entire research lifecycle: planning, execution, reporting, archiving, and discovery.