Main content

Home

Menu

Loading wiki pages...

View
Wiki Version:
Data and munging/analysis code for analysis of sexism on Twitter during key events of the 2016 U.S. Presidential election. Code: https://github.com/seanrife/2016_election Data: https://osf.io/8nrfm **References** - Cassese, E. and Holman, M. R. (2018). Playing the woman card: ambivalent sexism in the 2016 u.s. presidential race. *Political Psychology, 40*(1), 55-74. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12492 - Knuckey, J. (2018). “i just don't think she has a presidential look”: sexism and vote choice in the 2016 election*. *Social Science Quarterly, 100*(1), 342-358. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12547 - Georgeac, O., Rattan, A., & Effron, D. A. (2018). An exploratory investigation of americans’ expression of gender bias before and after the 2016 presidential election. *Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10*(5), 632-642. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550618776624 - Rothwell, V., Hodson, G., & Prusaczyk, E. (2019). Why Pillory Hillary? Testing the endemic sexism hypothesis regarding the 2016 US election. *Personality and Individual Differences, 138*, 106-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.09.034
OSF does not support the use of Internet Explorer. For optimal performance, please switch to another browser.
Accept
This website relies on cookies to help provide a better user experience. By clicking Accept or continuing to use the site, you agree. For more information, see our Privacy Policy and information on cookie use.
Accept
×

Start managing your projects on the OSF today.

Free and easy to use, the Open Science Framework supports the entire research lifecycle: planning, execution, reporting, archiving, and discovery.