### summary [working log](https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ufn-FKG0SioBZBy2ddsYQEnJmgXticR420uhbUGhalA/edit#gid=1338190604) <br> [Results]() - Effect size of our interest 1. Roediger and McDermott (1995) > The rate of false alarms was higher for the weakly related lures (.21) than for the unrelated lures, t(35) = 7.40, SEM = .026, p < .001 Because $d = \frac{2t}{\sqrt{df}}$, we got Cohen's d was 2.5. 2. Wang et al. (2018) Exp 2 > Specifically, the self- reference condition had significantly higher false memories than the other-reference condition did, t(28) = 3.19, p= .004, Cohen’s d= 0.61, and the neutral condition, t(28) = 2.45, p =.02,Cohen’ s d= 0.46. Smallest effect size of our interest would be 0.46. Largest effect size of our interest would be 2.5. 3. Estimated power by [PANGEA](https://jakewestfall.shinyapps.io/pangea/) ||0.5|1.0|1.5|2.0| |---|---|---|---|---| |10| 0.140 |0.409|0.734|0.93| |20| 0.255 |0.738|0.973|| |30| 0.368 |0.900|||| |50| 0.564 ||||| |100|0.858 ||||| |150|0.961 |||||