Main content

Home

Menu

View
Wiki Version:
IMPORTANT NOTES: 1. This code is no longer maintained and may not work in the latest version of PsychoPy. 2. Based on my extensive experience using this task, I no longer recommend that others make use of it in their work. Responses on the task are exceptionally noisy, and there is strong evidence to believe the literature contains a significant degree of publication bias and/or p-hacking. See [here](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1y5lsGWkDLX8oFSamI3AY3R7kaFIqk640pLCqrDfCM48/edit?usp=sharing) for a presentation I gave on the various issues with the IRAP and IRAP literature at the 2019 Association for Contextual Behavioral Science conference.
OSF does not support the use of Internet Explorer. For optimal performance, please switch to another browser.
Accept
This website relies on cookies to help provide a better user experience. By clicking Accept or continuing to use the site, you agree. For more information, see our Privacy Policy and information on cookie use.
Accept
×

Start managing your projects on the OSF today.

Free and easy to use, the Open Science Framework supports the entire research lifecycle: planning, execution, reporting, archiving, and discovery.

Copyright © 2011-2024 Center for Open Science | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Status | API
TOP Guidelines | Reproducibility Project: Psychology | Reproducibility Project: Cancer Biology