Main content

Date created: | Last Updated:

: DOI | ARK

Creating DOI. Please wait...

Create DOI

Category: Project

Description: At present, very little is known about the processes underlying L2 speakers’ understanding of written metaphors and similes. This information would add to current theories on figurative language comprehension, which often do not take into account reader-related factors. In the present study, we used eye tracking to examine how native Finnish speakers (N = 63) read written English nominal metaphors (“education is a stairway”) and similes (“education is like a stairway”). Identical words were used in the topic–vehicle pair (education–stairway) in both conditions. After reading, participants evaluated familiarity of each topic-vehicle pair as metaphors. Participants’ English proficiency was measured using the Bilingual-language Profile Questionnaire and the Lexical Test for Advanced Learners of English (LexTale). The results showed that readers were more likely to regress within metaphors than within similes, indicating that processing of metaphors requires more processing effort than processing of similes. The familiarity of a metaphor and second language (L2) English proficiency modulated this effect. The results are discussed in the light of current theories on figurative language processing.

Wiki

Add important information, links, or images here to describe your project.

Files

Loading files...

Citation

Recent Activity

Loading logs...

OSF does not support the use of Internet Explorer. For optimal performance, please switch to another browser.
Accept
This website relies on cookies to help provide a better user experience. By clicking Accept or continuing to use the site, you agree. For more information, see our Privacy Policy and information on cookie use.
Accept
×

Start managing your projects on the OSF today.

Free and easy to use, the Open Science Framework supports the entire research lifecycle: planning, execution, reporting, archiving, and discovery.