Main content

Home

Menu

Loading wiki pages...

View
Wiki Version:
Much previous research on spelling and reading development has focused on single-syllable words. Here we examined disyllables, asking how learners of English mark the distinction between short and long first-syllable vowels by use of vowel digraphs and double-consonant digraphs. In a behavioral study, we asked participants in Grades 2 (n = 32, mean age about 8 years), 4 (n = 33, mean age about 10 years), 6 (n = 32, mean age about 12 years), and university (n = 32; mean age about 20 years) to spell nonwords with short and long first-syllable vowels. We found an increase across grade levels in use of vowel digraphs to represent long vowels, and we also found increasing use of double-consonant digraphs after short vowels. Participants generally avoided using both a vowel digraph and a following consonant digraph. In a vocabulary analysis, we examined use of vowel and double-consonant digraphs in the words to which readers of different grade levels are exposed. Children used vowel digraphs less often than anticipated on the basis of the vocabulary statistics, but university students used them at similar rates. For double-consonant digraphs after short vowels, rates of digraph use were lower in the behavioral data than the vocabulary data even for university students. These results point to the difficulty of spelling a phoneme with multiple letters when those letters simultaneously spell another sound in a word. We discuss the results in terms of the roles of statistical learning and explicit instruction in the development of spelling.
OSF does not support the use of Internet Explorer. For optimal performance, please switch to another browser.
Accept
This website relies on cookies to help provide a better user experience. By clicking Accept or continuing to use the site, you agree. For more information, see our Privacy Policy and information on cookie use.
Accept
×

Start managing your projects on the OSF today.

Free and easy to use, the Open Science Framework supports the entire research lifecycle: planning, execution, reporting, archiving, and discovery.