Results and Data

doi:None

Title	Authors

Home

Under the full data model (no adjustment for passing the comprehension check), we found that participants adjusted their contributions to match the norms (F (2, 265) = 4.711, *p* < .01. Post-hoc testing (LSD) revealed that participants who were told the norm was high gave more ((37.689, SD = 15.442) than if they hadn't been told anything (32.689, SD = 17.659) or wee told the norm was low (29.824, SD = 17.496; both *p*s < .049). Participants told the norm was low differed from if they were told the norm was high (*p* < .002) but not if they hadn't been told anything (*p* > .257). There was no effect of the speed manipulation nor the interaction of speed with norms (both *p*s > .903). None of these results substantively changed after controlling for level of greed.

OSF does not support the use of Internet Explorer. For optimal performance, please switch to another browser.

This website relies on cookies to help provide a better user experience. By clicking Accept or continuing to use the site, you agree. For more information, see our Privacy Policy and information on cookie use.

Start managing your projects on the OSF today.

Free and easy to use, the Open Science Framework supports the entire research lifecycle: planning, execution, reporting, archiving, and discovery.

Create an Account Learn More Hide this message

Main content

Home

Menu

Start managing your projects on the OSF today.

Main content

Links to this project

Home

Menu

Add new wiki page

Page permissions have changed

Wiki page deleted

Connected to the collaborative wiki

Connecting to the collaborative wiki

Collaborative wiki is unavailable

Browser unsupported

Start managing your projects on the OSF today.