Main content

Home

Menu

Loading wiki pages...

View
Wiki Version:
ROC data (i.e., response frequencies) from various sources. The data are all in white-space separated text format with the first row containing the variable names (`header`). Following is a description of the columns. - `6point.txt`: *6-point Yes/No ROC data* - `0_1` ... `0_6`: old items; from "sure new" (1) to "sure old" (6) - `1_1` ... `1_6`: new items; from "sure new" to "sure old" - `Exp`: Experiment (see Table 1 of the paper for details) - `Par`: Participant ID, consecutively numbered per data set. - `8point.txt`: *8-point Yes/No ROC data* - `old_1` ... `old_8`: old items; from "sure new" (1) to "sure old" (8) - `new_1` ... `new_8`: new items; from "sure new" to "sure old" - `exp`: Experiment (see Table 1 for details) - `id`: Participant ID, consecutively numbered per data set. **Whenever using any of the data available here, please make sure to cite the original sources given in the following.** *For 6-point ROCs* (corresponding to the values of `Exp`): - `dede_control`, `dede_delay`, & `dede_ impaired`: Dede, A. J. O., Wixted, J. T., Hopkins, R. O., & Squire, L. R. (2013). Hippocampal damage impairs recognition memory broadly, affecting both parameters in two prominent models of memory. *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences*, 110(16), 6577–6582. [http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1304739110][1] - `Dube_2012-P` & `Dube_2012-W`: Dube, C., & Rotello, C. M. (2012). Binary ROCs in perception and recognition memory are curved. *Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition*, 38(1), 130–151. [http://doi.org/10.1037/a0024957][2] - `heathcote_2006_e1` & `heathcote_2006_e2`: Heathcote, A., Ditton, E., & Mitchell, K. (2006). Word frequency and word likeness mirror effects in episodic recognition memory. *Memory & Cognition*, 34(4), 826–838. [http://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193430][3] - `Jaeger_2013`: Jaeger, A., Cox, J. C., & Dobbins, I. G. (2012). Recognition confidence under violated and confirmed memory expectations. *Journal of Experimental Psychology: General*, 141(2), 282–301. [http://doi.org/10.1037/a0025687][4] - `Jang_2009`: Jang, Y., Wixted, J. T., & Huber, D. E. (2009). Testing signal-detection models of yes/no and two-alternative forced-choice recognition memory. *Journal of Experimental Psychology: General*, 138(2), 291–306. [http://doi.org/10.1037/a0015525][5] - `Koen-2013_full` & `Koen-2013_immediate`: Koen, J. D., Aly, M., Wang, W.-C., & Yonelinas, A. P. (2013). Examining the causes of memory strength variability: Recollection, attention failure, or encoding variability? *Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition*, 39(6), 1726–1741. [http://doi.org/10.1037/a0033671][6] - `Koen_2010_pure`: Koen, J. D., & Yonelinas, A. P. (2010). Memory variability is due to the contribution of recollection and familiarity, not to encoding variability. *Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition*, 36(6), 1536–1542. [http://doi.org/10.1037/a0020448][7] - `Koen_2011`: Koen, J. D., & Yonelinas, A. P. (2011). From humans to rats and back again: Bridging the divide between human and animal studies of recognition memory with receiver operating characteristics. *Learning & Memory*, 18(8), 519–522. [http://doi.org/10.1101/lm.2214511][8] - `Pratte_2010`: Pratte, M. S., Rouder, J. N., & Morey, R. D. (2010). Separating mnemonic process from participant and item effects in the assessment of ROC asymmetries. *Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition*, 36(1), 224–232. [http://doi.org/10.1037/a0017682][9] - `Smith_2004`: Smith, D. G., & Duncan, M. J. J. (2004). Testing Theories of Recognition Memory by Predicting Performance Across Paradigms. *Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory & Cognition*, 30(3), 615–625. - `van_zandt`: Van Zandt, T. (2000). ROC curves and confidence judgments in recognition memory. *Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition*, 26, 582–600. [http://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.26.3.582][10] *For 8-point ROCs* (corresponding to the values of `exp`): - `Benjamin`: Benjamin, A. S., Tullis, J. G., & Lee, J. H. (2013). Criterion Noise in Ratings-Based Recognition: Evidence From the Effects of Response Scale Length on Recognition Accuracy. *Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition*, 39, 1601-1608. [http://doi.org/10.1037/a0031849][11] - `Onyper_Pic` & `Onyper_Words`: Onyper, S. V., Zhang, Y. X., & Howard, M. W. (2010). Some-or-none recollection: Evidence from item and source memory. *Journal of Experimental Psychology: General*, 139(2), 341–364. [http://doi.org/10.1037/a0018926][12] [1]: http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1304739110 [2]: http://doi.org/10.1037/a0024957 [3]: http://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193430 [4]: http://doi.org/10.1037/a0025687 [5]: http://doi.org/10.1037/a0015525 [6]: http://doi.org/10.1037/a0033671 [7]: http://doi.org/10.1037/a0020448 [8]: http://doi.org/10.1101/lm.2214511 [9]: http://doi.org/10.1037/a0017682 [10]: http://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.26.3.582 [11]: http://doi.org/10.1037/a0031849 [12]: http://doi.org/10.1037/a0018926
OSF does not support the use of Internet Explorer. For optimal performance, please switch to another browser.
Accept
This website relies on cookies to help provide a better user experience. By clicking Accept or continuing to use the site, you agree. For more information, see our Privacy Policy and information on cookie use.
Accept
×

Start managing your projects on the OSF today.

Free and easy to use, the Open Science Framework supports the entire research lifecycle: planning, execution, reporting, archiving, and discovery.