Main content

Contributors:
  1. lisa Schäfer
  2. Aaron Greenhouse-Tucknott

Date created: | Last Updated:

: DOI | ARK

Creating DOI. Please wait...

Create DOI

Category: Project

Description: The assessment of voluntary activation of the knee extensors using transcranial magnetic stimulation (VATMS) is routinely performed to assess the supraspinal function. Yet methodological scrutiny of the technique, whether used at rest or more crucially following exercise, is scarce. The aim of the present study was to examine face validity and reliability of VATMS and its two main determinants (superimposed twitch during a maximal voluntary contraction [SIT100%] and estimated resting twitch [ERT] at rest and following intermittent isometric fatiguing exercise. Responsiveness of VATMS to the exercise intervention was also measured. The findings indicated issues regarding the accuracy of ERT and suggested a three-point relationship should not to be used to determine ERT. Reliabilities for VATMS, SIT100% and ERT were acceptable at rest but much weaker post-exercise (especially for SIT100%). Despite 6statistically significant changes in the main neuromuscular variables following the 6intermittent isometric fatiguing exercise (P<0.05), when post-exercise reliability was considered, the exercise effect on VATMS was smaller than the smallest detectable change in 18 of the 20 individual tests performed, and for the whole sample for one of the two visits. Consequently, these changes were not deemed detectable. Finally, neuromuscular fatigue was present following the neuromuscular assessment (NMA) at rest, and recovery was evidenced during the post-exercise NMA questioning the face validity of this routinely used protocol

License: CC-By Attribution 4.0 International

Files

Loading files...

Citation

Components

Improving the measurement of TMS-assessed voluntary activation in the knee extensors

Dekerle, Greenhouse-Tucknott, Wrightson & 2 more
The present study was designed to test the accuracy, validity, reliability and sensitivity of the main outcomes of alternative methods for the measure...

Recent Activity

Loading logs...

Recent Activity

Loading logs...

OSF does not support the use of Internet Explorer. For optimal performance, please switch to another browser.
Accept
This website relies on cookies to help provide a better user experience. By clicking Accept or continuing to use the site, you agree. For more information, see our Privacy Policy and information on cookie use.
Accept
×

Start managing your projects on the OSF today.

Free and easy to use, the Open Science Framework supports the entire research lifecycle: planning, execution, reporting, archiving, and discovery.