Main content

Home

Menu

View
Wiki Version:
The second pilot is to be interpreted in the aggregate. We used scenarios from our first pilot (and the scenarios thus differ per site, but the priming method does not). Analyses per site: 1. Bamberg (http://rpubs.com/ivanropovik/256812) 2. Fort Lewis (http://rpubs.com/ivanropovik/256811) 3. Kassel (http://rpubs.com/ivanropovik/256897) 4. Presov (http://rpubs.com/ivanropovik/259185) Together with the original authors we thus decided (after collecting 5 out of our 9 sites) to change the priming method.
OSF does not support the use of Internet Explorer. For optimal performance, please switch to another browser.
Accept
This website relies on cookies to help provide a better user experience. By clicking Accept or continuing to use the site, you agree. For more information, see our Privacy Policy and information on cookie use.
Accept
×

Start managing your projects on the OSF today.

Free and easy to use, the Open Science Framework supports the entire research lifecycle: planning, execution, reporting, archiving, and discovery.

Copyright © 2011-2024 Center for Open Science | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Status | API
TOP Guidelines | Reproducibility Project: Psychology | Reproducibility Project: Cancer Biology