Accelerator Study #1: Face Rating  /

To Which World Regions Does the Valence-Dominance Model of Social Perception Apply?

Contributors:
  1. Peter Babinčák
  2. Martha Lucia Borras-Guevara
  3. Sun Jun Cai
  4. Lilian Carvalho
  5. Vinet Coetzee
  6. Paulo RS Ferreira
  7. Gwendolyn Gardiner
  8. Amanda C Hahn
  9. Javad Hatami
  10. Natalia Irrazabal
  11. Zhongqing Jiang
  12. Julia Junger
  13. Gwenael Kaminski
  14. Georgina W Mburu
  15. Arash Monajem
  16. JA Muñoz-reyes
  17. Tonje Kvande Nielsen
  18. Julian A Oldmeadow
  19. Asil Ali Özdoğru
  20. Isabel R Pinto
  21. Pablo Polo
  22. John Protzko
  23. Diana R Santos
  24. Guyan Sloane
  25. Therese E Sverdrup
  26. Kokwei Tan
  27. Dong Tiantian
  28. Enrique Turiegano
  29. Kim Uittenhove
  30. Eugenio Valderrama
  31. Jaroslava Varella Valentova
  32. Varella, M A C
  33. David White
  34. Wen-Jing Yan

Date created: | Last Updated:

: DOI | ARK

Creating DOI. Please wait...

Create DOI

Category: Project

Description: Over the last ten years, Oosterhof and Todorov’s valence-dominance model has emerged as the most prominent account of how people evaluate faces on social dimensions. In this model, two dimensions (valence and dominance) underpin social judgments of faces. To which world regions this model applies is a critical, yet unanswered, question. We will address this question by replicating Oosterhof and Todorov’s methodology across multiple world regions.

License: CC-By Attribution 4.0 International

Files

Loading files...

Citation

Tags

Recent Activity

Loading logs...

OSF does not support the use of Internet Explorer. For optimal performance, please switch to another browser.
Accept
This website relies on cookies to help provide a better user experience. By clicking Accept or continuing to use the site, you agree. For more information, see our Privacy Policy and information on cookie use.
Accept
×

Start managing your projects on the OSF today.

Free and easy to use, the Open Science Framework supports the entire research lifecycle: planning, execution, reporting, archiving, and discovery.