Main content

Home

Menu

Loading wiki pages...

View
Wiki Version:
**Hangar X** 200.000 unused sq meter in Tempelhoff Process as democratic process Proposa: create a fucs on the building – vibrant city district Publc discussion and the commoning structure reclaim the public space 5.000 one of the six empty hangars Torhaus – 55m2- scale **Stavros** - Be there without being there Commoning as a form of collective self-management The practices of commmoning as a way to persue self-management. Argument, distributing a new form of theoretical reasoning. The need to rethink the temr of commoning and commons. They are not inocent, they are used by different actor sin the instituional and academic actors. Eevn theWb . Describe our wn entrance in the disucssion: there are different interpretations. Let’s agrre in: - commoning as a porces not as commoms as a ‘thing’ out there. Practices that define rules of sharing – andnot every kind of sharing is based on equiality (equity) – those are caes of ‘correpted commoning’. The process employs people that are not simple entering the precess as they are – with their identities – but they are transformed. - The ways of doing shape the practices: Comunalidad’ as Esteva: is a horazon on intelegibility – t understand the world, hwat we mean when we erefer to a certain ‘we’: is this a porcess that has o do with social emanpcipatio: is ti inehrent in this process? - Two images: rio de Janeiro: a feast that conmemorates the lading of the first slaves in Rio: recalaiming the space as a common ground. Bodies construct the space of commonign & Mexico: sharign not only sace,buy also forms of collaboration, and coordination towards a shared aim. - Common space. An explicit scope of urban commons- produced be the practice of commoning. It’s not queantificable: it denies and guides. Controls, directs the process of sharing. Commons as forms of social relations. Space commongin is not just a way to share but a factor of commoning. The space can also survive by expanding: unless we are pushing the limits of enclosure. It won’t survive. When you define a border and an externality that prduced in itself. - Commoning as thrshold space. Is not a plce defined by a shared identity it’s a placein the limit: awarness of differences, an are of comaprison and translation – aporcess that always leaves something outside. Through negonations. What commons space is not: - private space – but can be ignied - public space - - community space – the community as we know it; althugh in many cases weel-organised ommunity opens the opportunity of creating a comon space. But they only produce commons if they are open to outsiders to participate as users and commoners. Three levels: - organisation of spactial relations. - forms of expression through which the values of commoning can be transmited to others. - conditions under whcih this place has been produced, shared work and collaboration. Appropriatttion and sharing public space - Former municipal market in Athens – meeting and market space. - Navarinu Park - - Brasilia Teimosa Hoising as commons - Cooperativismo – - Ayuda mutua: self management nos as a idelogical choice but as comming form the needs – specially in rural areas: as someone said to Stavros: “individualism is for the rich, we poors can ot affordt it” - Collective ownership. Examples: - Uruguay - MTST: Institutions de Assistencia Tecnica: “Trial by space” (Lefevbre, : 416) – explore the – performing space. Thrugh the process of sharing, and commoning . Neter the stronghold of the monopoly of opwer. Ho to disperce and share power. **Ana** Commoning as a process - MICRO Commons as a perspective - MACRO Comons as a practice - MESO Public-commmon as a threshold – translation and diplomacy . That also leaves somethign behind , and transform. Common-Codes To common the space, but also the decision over the space. Femenist approach to the need to make the rules of engagement clear. Hackers open-codes and collaborative processes Middle-scale Everything happens at the sametime! SilviaFederici: The capacity of politization. Housing struggles in Spain PAH: the transformation of legislation. ////////////////// Respnsability / Obligations / Resposnsibility vs Solidarity
OSF does not support the use of Internet Explorer. For optimal performance, please switch to another browser.
Accept
This website relies on cookies to help provide a better user experience. By clicking Accept or continuing to use the site, you agree. For more information, see our Privacy Policy and information on cookie use.
Accept
×

Start managing your projects on the OSF today.

Free and easy to use, the Open Science Framework supports the entire research lifecycle: planning, execution, reporting, archiving, and discovery.