**Issues to note with the article**:
Mini meta analysis aggregate of post-intervention effect in Experiment 4:
- The mini-meta analysis of the effects included the post-intervention
effect in Experiment 4. For a more accurate mini-meta, we should have
used the pre-intervention effect.
- No one reported this. I noticed this when going over the project/code
years later (2021).
Wrong t-values
- Reported April 21, 2022, by a group in Tilburg doing reproductions:
Rick Klein and Jelte Wicherts.
- In page 544 we wrote: "The participants in the escalation-as-action
condition recorded the highest anticipated joy rating for successful
escalation (M = 90.72, SD = 14.47), whereas those in the
de-escalation- as-action condition recorded the lowest (M = 80.09, SD
= 24.21), t(150) = 122.51, p = .001, mean difference = 10.63, 95% CI = [4.24, 17.02], d = 0.54)"
- The t-values t(150) = 122.51 are wrong and should be 3.29.
- The 122.51 is likely the degrees of freedom from the Welch t-test,
and this is a result of bad copy-paste from the Rmarkdown output.
- This is categorized as a minor issue, given that it does not change
any of our core conclusions, and 5USD have been rewarded for finding
and reporting this mistake, matched by 5USD and donated to Givewell.
- Posted on Pubpeer on April 26,
2022.(https://pubpeer.com/publications/DB509378F138656C42F2C9B8E50DBD)
