**Original citation.** Berry, C.J., Shanks, D.R., & Henson, R.N. A single-system account of the relationship between priming, recognition, and fluency. *Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34*(1), 97-111.
**Target of replication.** We seek to replicate Berry et al.'s finding, from study 1, that response times to misses (old items judged as new) were significantly faster than response times to correct rejections (new items judge as new), t(23) = 3.55, p = .002. The other three studies in the paper were simulation studies—as the RP:P asks replicators to collect new data, the first study was chosen for replication.
**A priori replication criteria.** A successful replication would find that response times to misses would be significantly faster than those to correct rejections, indicating that memory sources for priming and recognition are independent.
If the homogeneity of variance assumption was violated, a Welch’s t-test will be employed, acting as the effect of interest. Homogeneity of variance will be tested by the Levene’s test for homogeneity of variance. Berry et al. (2008) did not use a Welch’s t-test.
The final report and results can be found [here][1].
[1]: https://osf.io/yc2fe/
