In this project we primarily test the speed of implicit adaptation (without suppressing implicit adaptation as in error-clamped paradigms). # Four experiments First, we do this in 4 rotation sizes, serving mostly to confirm that our method can detect expected changes. (experiment 1) Then we test this in various types of feedback that are usually associated with increased explicit adaptation. We find little effect on the speed of implicit adaptation here, despite (mostly) increased explicit adaptation (experiments 2 & 3). Finally, we confirm an earlier finding that having aiming trials throughout the experiment triggers explicit strategies even in a rotation size that already spontaneously evokes explicit strategies. However, this does not affect implicit adaptation either (experiment 4). # Data For all four experiments we provide raw data (exp1.zip, exp2.zip, exp3,zip and exp4.zip). There is one file with demographics information on the participants (demographics.csv) in all 4 experiments: age, sex, handedness, vision, etc, and there is one file with meta-information on the sessions: the logged start and end time of the two questionnaires they did (one with informed consent and demographics, one with session-relevant information) with time in the Toronto time zone, and the task time (in the UK time-zone). Finally, there is a file with processed data: mainly the bootstrapped parameter values for the exponential function fitted to the timecourse. # Documents We provide several documents here. Primarily a notebook with all statistics, but also all figures in several formats, a document with the tables and a few of the posters we presented on this project. We used a drawing tablet for this experiment with a plexiglass stencil limiting the reaches and thus guiding the participants to some degree. This stencil can be downloaded from the associated component. It is for the Wacom Intuos3, and it is the radial stencil with a diameter of 20 cm. There is both a PDF, and a DXF file suitable for cutting the stencil.