Loading wiki pages...

Wiki Version:
<p><strong>Welcome to Princeton ReproducibiliTea!</strong> <br>Wednesdays 3:00-4:00 p.m.<br> <strong><em>All further meetings will be held virually via ZOOM</em></strong>. See links below. </p> <hr> <p><strong>Spring 2020 Schedule and Readings</strong></p> <hr> <p><strong>March 11</strong>: Reproducibility Now: Many studies don’t reproduce and why.<br> Open Science Collaboration (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716-aac4716. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716" rel="nofollow">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716</a><br> Zoom: <a href="https://princeton.zoom.us/j/821234886" rel="nofollow">https://princeton.zoom.us/j/821234886</a></p> <p><strong>March 18</strong>: <strong>Break</strong></p> <p><strong>March 25</strong>: Has the debate gone too far? Things will just turn out fine, won’t they?<br> Pashler, H., & Harris, C. R. (2012). Is the Replicability Crisis Overblown? Three Arguments Examined. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 531–536 <a href="http://www.jstor.org/stable/44282602" rel="nofollow">www.jstor.org/stable/44282602</a><br> Zoom: <a href="https://princeton.zoom.us/j/812997472" rel="nofollow">https://princeton.zoom.us/j/812997472</a> </p> <p><strong>April 1</strong>: Analytical flexibility illustrated<br> Silberzahn, R., et al. (2018). Many Analysts, One Data Set: Making Transparent How Variations in Analytic Choices Affect Results. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(3), 337–356. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917747646" rel="nofollow">https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917747646</a><br> Zoom: <a href="https://princeton.zoom.us/j/371546741" rel="nofollow">https://princeton.zoom.us/j/371546741</a> </p> <p><strong>April 8</strong>: And the future? The myth of self-correction.<br> Smaldino, P. E., & McElreath, R. (2016). The natural selection of bad science. Royal Society Open Science, 3(9), 160384. <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1605.09511" rel="nofollow">https://arxiv.org/abs/1605.09511</a><br> Zoom: <a href="https://princeton.zoom.us/j/547534592" rel="nofollow">https://princeton.zoom.us/j/547534592</a> </p> <p><strong>April 15</strong>: Making neuroimaging reproducible <br> <strong>Guests: Pygers, the Princeton Neuroimaging Support</strong> Group<br> Poldrack, R. A., Baker, C. I., Durnez, J., Gorgolewski, K. J., Matthews, P. M., Munafò, M. R., … Yarkoni, T. (2017). Scanning the horizon: towards transparent and reproducible neuroimaging research. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 18, 115. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2016.167" rel="nofollow">https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2016.167</a><br> Zoom: <a href="https://princeton.zoom.us/j/383425983" rel="nofollow">https://princeton.zoom.us/j/383425983</a></p> <hr> <p>Co-facilitators: Robin Gomila and Meghan Testerman <br> Sponsored by Betsy Levy Paluck and the Princeton University Library <br> Hosted by the Department of Psychology<br> OSF Repository: <a href="https://osf.io/af4td/" rel="nofollow">https://osf.io/af4td/</a><br> Twitter: <a href="https://twitter.com/Princeton_Tea" rel="nofollow">@Princeton_Tea</a><br> Join the Listserv: <a href="https://tinyurl.com/sshhkjd" rel="nofollow">https://tinyurl.com/sshhkjd</a> </p>
OSF does not support the use of Internet Explorer. For optimal performance, please switch to another browser.
This website relies on cookies to help provide a better user experience. By clicking Accept or continuing to use the site, you agree. For more information, see our Privacy Policy and information on cookie use.

Start managing your projects on the OSF today.

Free and easy to use, the Open Science Framework supports the entire research lifecycle: planning, execution, reporting, archiving, and discovery.