Home

Menu

Loading wiki pages...

View
Wiki Version:
<p><strong>Welcome to Princeton ReproducibiliTea!</strong> <br>Wednesdays 3:00-4:00 p.m.<br> <strong><em>All further meetings will be held virually via ZOOM</em></strong>. See links below. </p> <hr> <p><strong>Spring 2020 Schedule and Readings</strong></p> <hr> <p><strong>March 11</strong>: Reproducibility Now: Many studies don’t reproduce and why.<br> Open Science Collaboration (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716-aac4716. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716" rel="nofollow">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716</a><br> Zoom: <a href="https://princeton.zoom.us/j/821234886" rel="nofollow">https://princeton.zoom.us/j/821234886</a></p> <p><strong>March 18</strong>: <strong>Break</strong></p> <p><strong>March 25</strong>: Has the debate gone too far? Things will just turn out fine, won’t they?<br> Pashler, H., & Harris, C. R. (2012). Is the Replicability Crisis Overblown? Three Arguments Examined. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 531–536 <a href="http://www.jstor.org/stable/44282602" rel="nofollow">www.jstor.org/stable/44282602</a><br> Zoom: <a href="https://princeton.zoom.us/j/812997472" rel="nofollow">https://princeton.zoom.us/j/812997472</a> </p> <p><strong>April 1</strong>: Analytical flexibility illustrated<br> Silberzahn, R., et al. (2018). Many Analysts, One Data Set: Making Transparent How Variations in Analytic Choices Affect Results. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(3), 337–356. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917747646" rel="nofollow">https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917747646</a><br> Zoom: <a href="https://princeton.zoom.us/j/371546741" rel="nofollow">https://princeton.zoom.us/j/371546741</a> </p> <p><strong>April 8</strong>: And the future? The myth of self-correction.<br> Smaldino, P. E., & McElreath, R. (2016). The natural selection of bad science. Royal Society Open Science, 3(9), 160384. <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1605.09511" rel="nofollow">https://arxiv.org/abs/1605.09511</a><br> Zoom: <a href="https://princeton.zoom.us/j/547534592" rel="nofollow">https://princeton.zoom.us/j/547534592</a> </p> <p><strong>April 15</strong>: Making neuroimaging reproducible <br> <strong>Guests: Pygers, the Princeton Neuroimaging Support</strong> Group<br> Poldrack, R. A., Baker, C. I., Durnez, J., Gorgolewski, K. J., Matthews, P. M., Munafò, M. R., … Yarkoni, T. (2017). Scanning the horizon: towards transparent and reproducible neuroimaging research. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 18, 115. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2016.167" rel="nofollow">https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2016.167</a><br> Zoom: <a href="https://princeton.zoom.us/j/383425983" rel="nofollow">https://princeton.zoom.us/j/383425983</a></p> <hr> <p>Co-facilitators: Robin Gomila and Meghan Testerman <br> Sponsored by Betsy Levy Paluck and the Princeton University Library <br> Hosted by the Department of Psychology<br> OSF Repository: <a href="https://osf.io/af4td/" rel="nofollow">https://osf.io/af4td/</a><br> Twitter: <a href="https://twitter.com/Princeton_Tea" rel="nofollow">@Princeton_Tea</a><br> Join the Listserv: <a href="https://tinyurl.com/sshhkjd" rel="nofollow">https://tinyurl.com/sshhkjd</a> </p>
OSF does not support the use of Internet Explorer. For optimal performance, please switch to another browser.
Accept
This website relies on cookies to help provide a better user experience. By clicking Accept or continuing to use the site, you agree. For more information, see our Privacy Policy and information on cookie use.
Accept
×

Start managing your projects on the OSF today.

Free and easy to use, the Open Science Framework supports the entire research lifecycle: planning, execution, reporting, archiving, and discovery.