Main content

Home

Menu

Loading wiki pages...

View
Wiki Version:
This interdisciplinary study, coupling legal theory with empirical analysis, presents preliminary insight into the role of emotion in criminalization decisions. While the traditional approach in legal theory emphasizes the role of deliberative and reasoned argumentation, this study hypothesizes that affective and emotional processes (i.e. disgust, as indexed by a dispositional proneness to experience disgust) are also associated with the decision to criminalize behavior, in particular virtual child pornography. To test this empirically, an online survey (N = 1,402) was conducted in which participants provided criminalization ratings on four vignettes adapted from criminal law, in which harmfulness and disgustingness were varied orthogonally. They also completed the 25-item Disgust Scale-Revised (DS-R-NL). In line with the hypothesis, a) the virtual child pornography vignette (characterized as low in harm, high in disgust) was criminalized more readily than the financial harm-vignette (high in harm, low in disgust), and b) disgust sensitivity was significantly associated with the decision to criminalize virtual child pornography, both among lay participants and legal experts (b = 0.48, SE = .04, 95% CI [0.41, 0.56]). These findings suggest that emotion can be relevant in shaping criminalization decisions. Exploring this theoretically, the results could serve as a stepping stone for the development of a new perspective on criminalization theory, including an inherent "criminalization bias". Limitations and implications for legal theory and policymaking are discussed.
OSF does not support the use of Internet Explorer. For optimal performance, please switch to another browser.
Accept
This website relies on cookies to help provide a better user experience. By clicking Accept or continuing to use the site, you agree. For more information, see our Privacy Policy and information on cookie use.
Accept
×

Start managing your projects on the OSF today.

Free and easy to use, the Open Science Framework supports the entire research lifecycle: planning, execution, reporting, archiving, and discovery.