Main content

Date created: | Last Updated:

: DOI | ARK

Creating DOI. Please wait...

Create DOI

Category: Project

Description: Certain “generic” generalizations concern functions and purposes, e.g., /cars are for driving/. Some functional properties yield unacceptable teleological generics: for instance, /cars are for parking/ seems false even though people park cars as often as they drive them. No theory of teleology in philosophy or psychology can explain what makes teleological generics acceptable. However, a recent theory (Prasada, 2017; Prasada & Dillingham, 2006; Prasada et al., 2013) argues that a certain type of mental representation – a “principled” connection between a kind and a property – licenses generic generalizations. The account predicts that people should accept teleological generics that describe kinds and properties linked by a principled connection. Under the analysis, /car/ bears a principled connection to /driving/ (a car’s primary purpose) and a non-principled connection to /parking/ (an incidental consequence of driving). We report four experiments that tested and corroborated the theory’s predictions, and we describe a regression analysis that rules out alternative accounts. We conclude by showing how the theory we developed can serve as the foundation for a general theory of teleological thinking.

License: CC-By Attribution 4.0 International

Has supplemental materials for Teleological generics on PsyArXiv

Wiki

Add important information, links, or images here to describe your project.

Files

Loading files...

Citation

Components

Teleological Generalizations (Paper) | Registered: 2018-06-21 01:49 UTC


Recent Activity

Loading logs...

Teleological Generalizations (Paper) | Registered: 2018-06-15 03:43 UTC


Recent Activity

Loading logs...

Teleological Generalizations (Paper) | Registered: 2018-02-22 21:37 UTC


Recent Activity

Loading logs...

Tags

Recent Activity

Loading logs...