Main content

Home

Menu

Loading wiki pages...

View
Wiki Version:
Commons – commons as meso > a onsecuence of the work I work – leran from the iniciatives in the filed/city // fieldwork – analysis thourgh definitions O made // you end up in the midddle – Ostrom – CPR they can be economic >> she is not interested in what they do; she is interested in the institutional side // she si not linking commons to a definition “there is no commons without commoning” – Trento – ‘uso civici’ – current expresons of more traditional commons; never refer to Rodotá - ethnographic aproach – never Negri / Dardot & Laval // it stiffens “”emergent”” / “resurgent” – the practice of commoning is not gratitotus - characterise commoning – “elucidate” – ecology >> interdependent dinamics of becoming – ontology is not fixed – and it moves forward; /////// commonig that fulfill a number of constraints // characterise the activity depends on the way of doing // /////// “fools wise is weeding around the young plan” - use concepts in order to understand what is happening. - “the pahntom public” – if you discuss from the theory – in the squares – you arrive to a reductionist approach // ///// conditions for the commoning – not the commoning // building structures for the commons to appear - //// presentation – lost of number of information, the structure is related to the approach – like an observatory of what is happening in Barcelona – SIMPLIFICATION - //// Kersun – rusian destroyed city // trust / interdependence / new way of positioning yourself / community – collectivity (include the non-human things actans that form together the possibilities of the commoning in relation to ecology of practices – you act according a number of constraints _ what you are suppose to do (obligations – internal need to act as – obligations form the lawer – football) >> and you requirements (what you ahave to reach, what the environment will accept or not) // if you want ot change the city, don’t look at the institutions – they are instituted / Latour is optimistic - they will protect the practice / commoing is imagination through - Generative urban planning – Patterns of Commons > ideas and paths in an analysis embeed within the commmons – (not rules) // Castoriadis – develop a new imaginary of social institutions – power; how to build new institutions – and they make into commons; Remix the commons – what is the value – not the same ‘ethos’ – you institute the ways of being / how we get empower ourselves to have answers Graber – anarchist anthropolgy / Latour – Modes of existance
OSF does not support the use of Internet Explorer. For optimal performance, please switch to another browser.
Accept
This website relies on cookies to help provide a better user experience. By clicking Accept or continuing to use the site, you agree. For more information, see our Privacy Policy and information on cookie use.
Accept
×

Start managing your projects on the OSF today.

Free and easy to use, the Open Science Framework supports the entire research lifecycle: planning, execution, reporting, archiving, and discovery.