The Effectiveness and Acceptability of Evidence-Based Practices for Gender Minority Youth

  1. John Weisz

Date created: | Last Updated:


Creating DOI. Please wait...

Create DOI

Category: Project

Description: Introduction: Gender minority (GM) youth report elevated rates of anxiety, depression, self-harm, suicidality, and other mental health concerns relative to cisgender youth. However, they are less likely to seek mental health care, a byproduct of treatment inaccessibility, discrimination, and non-affirming providers. Researchers have begun to tailor interventions to GM youth, yet little is known about the benefits of existing evidence-based practices (EBPs), as RCTs thereof have failed to account for gender identity. The present study evaluated the effectiveness of MATCH, a modular EBP, to determine if gender identity predicted treatment outcomes. Methods: Pooled across four RCTs, participants included N = 443 clinically referred school-age youth (ages 7-15; M = 10.6, SD = 2.2) treated by therapists trained in MATCH. Youth-reported mental health symptomatology was assessed via DSM-oriented scales of the Youth Self-Report (YSR). As the RCTs did not collect gender identity data, GM status was identified from YSR Item #110 (“I wish I were of the opposite sex”). Multilevel modeling was employed to assess for different trajectories of change in YSR T scores between n = 402 cisgender and n = 41 GM youth. Results: Across treatment, GM youth reported higher average mental health concerns than their cisgender peers. Both cisgender and GM youth showed significant improvement across DSM-oriented scales (i.e., affective, anxiety, conduct, and somatic problems) over treatment, and rates of change did not vary between subsamples. Discussion: GM youth experienced elevated symptomatology relative to cisgender youth, a disparity that may arise from exposure to stigma-related stressors. As GM youth’s symptoms improved at rates similar to those of cisgender youth, the potential benefits of EBPs necessitate addressing identity-based disparities in access to mental health services and discrimination therein.


Loading files...



Recent Activity

Loading logs...

OSF does not support the use of Internet Explorer. For optimal performance, please switch to another browser.
This website relies on cookies to help provide a better user experience. By clicking Accept or continuing to use the site, you agree. For more information, see our Privacy Policy and information on cookie use.

Start managing your projects on the OSF today.

Free and easy to use, the Open Science Framework supports the entire research lifecycle: planning, execution, reporting, archiving, and discovery.