### Final game 檢驗Schroeder and Epley(2015)實驗四的分析結果 - [Source page](https://sites.trinity.edu/osl/data-sets-and-activities/t-test-activities) - [Original paper](http://journals.sagepub.com/stoken/default+domain/PhtK6MPtXvkgnYRrnGbA/full) - [Data](https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bz-rhZ21ShvOei1MM24xNndnQ00/view) - [Reproduced analysis](https://osf.io/knepb/) #### Goals: **使用[單元示範檔](https://osf.io/h6xv8/)，完成以下目標** *前置說明* 1. 從原始論文裡，找出符合以下描述的結果分析文字與圖表。 > Imagine you were a job candidate trying to pitch your skills to a potential employer. Would you be more likely to get the job after giving a short speech describing your skills, or after writing a short speech and having a potential employer read those words? That was the question raised by Schroeder and Epley (2015). The authors predicted that a person’s speech (i.e., vocal tone, cadence, and pitch) communicates information about their intellect better than their written words (even if they are the same words as in the speech). > To examine this possibility, the authors randomly assigned 39 professional recruiters for Fortune 500 companies to one of two conditions. In the audio condition, participants listened to audio recordings of a job candidate’s spoken job pitch. In the transcript condition, participants read a transcription of the job candidate’s pitch. After hearing or reading the pitch, the participants rated the job candidates on three dimensions: intelligence, competence, and thoughtfulness. These ratings were then averaged to create a single measure of the job candidate’s intellect, with higher scores indicating the recruiters rated the candidates as higher in intellect. The participants also rated their overall impression of the job candidate (a composite of two items measuring positive and negative impressions). Finally, the participants indicated how likely they would be to recommend hiring the job candidate (0 - not at all likely, 10 - extremely likely). 2. 從原始資料(Data)欄位裡，找出完成前述文字與圖表必要的欄位。 3. 說明要完成原始論文中分析結果，需要使用的JASP模組。 * **檢驗目標有三組比較** *操作示範* 4. 參考對應的單元報告，示範獲得原始論文分析結果的步驟。 *長知識* 5. 說明再分析結果與原始論文相異或相同處 6. 說明原始論文的那些部分是JASP無法完全做到的。