It is well established that people often express emotions that are similar to those of other group members. It is not yet clear, however, whether and to what extent situations that activate emotional motives influence this tendency to show emotional similarity. In the present research, we examined this issue by considering emotional responses to political situations that either called for weak (Study 1) or strong (Study 2) negative emotions. In Study 3, we extended Study 2 by examining emotional interactions on Twitter in the context of the Ferguson unrest. Findings revealed that the motivation to feel weak emotions led people to be more influenced by weaker emotions than their own, whereas the motivation to feel strong emotions led people to be more influenced by stronger emotions than their own. Intriguingly, these motivations led people to change their emotions even after discovering that others’ emotions were similar to their own. Our findings enhance our ability to understand and predict emotional influence processes in different contexts and may therefore help explain how these processes unfold in group behavior.
This project currently have 3 studies (corresponding to the three studies in the paper emotion contagion: a motivated account).
Get more citations
This website relies on cookies to help provide a better user experience. By clicking Accept or continuing to use the site, you agree. For more information,
and information on cookie use.