Main content

Home

Menu

View
Wiki Version:
We will reverse scored responses to allocation that favored the ending outgroup in the data collection procedure. Participants rated their agreement (1 – Strongly disagree, 7 – Strongly agree) with seven allocations of bonus points that were to be awarded to members of both groups. Six allocations were unequal (one team would receive more points than the other), with three allocations favoring the ingroup and three favoring the outgroup. Ingroup favoritism was calculated by averaging the agreement towards all six of the unequal distributions. We will then run an ANOVA on the data with change (1=change, same = 1), blue end group (blue=1, green=0), and their interaction. We predict no interaction and higher ingroup favoritism in the group that stayed in the same gorup versus the group that switched.
OSF does not support the use of Internet Explorer. For optimal performance, please switch to another browser.
Accept
This website relies on cookies to help provide a better user experience. By clicking Accept or continuing to use the site, you agree. For more information, see our Privacy Policy and information on cookie use.
Accept
×

Start managing your projects on the OSF today.

Free and easy to use, the Open Science Framework supports the entire research lifecycle: planning, execution, reporting, archiving, and discovery.

Copyright © 2011-2024 Center for Open Science | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Status | API
TOP Guidelines | Reproducibility Project: Psychology | Reproducibility Project: Cancer Biology