Registered Reports: A Method to Increase the Credibility of Published Reports

Affiliated institutions: Center For Open Science, University of Virginia

Date created: | Last Updated:

: DOI | ARK

Creating DOI. Please wait...

Create DOI

Category: Project

Description: From abstract: Ignoring replications and negative results is bad for science. This special issue presents a novel publishing format – Registered Reports – as a partial solution.

This project represents an accepted preprint submitted to PsyArXiv . Learn more about how to work with preprint files. View preprint

Wiki

Ignoring replications and negative results is bad for science. This special issue presents a novel publishing format – Registered Reports – as a partial solution. Peer review occurs prior to data collection, design and analysis plans are preregistered, and results are reported regardless of outcome. Fifteen Registered Reports of replications of important published results in social psychology ar...

Files

Loading files...

Citation

Components

  • Replications of Important Results in Social Psychology: Special Issue of Social Psychology

    Fifteen Registered Reports that had peer review prior to data collection

    Recent Activity

    Loading logs...

  • Registered Reports

    A research publishing format in which protocols and analysis plans are peer reviewed and registered prior to data collection, then published regardles...

    Recent Activity

    Loading logs...

Tags

Recent Activity

Loading logs...

This website relies on cookies to help provide a better user experience. By clicking Accept or continuing to use the site, you agree. For more information, see our Privacy Policy and information on cookie use.
Accept
×

Start managing your projects on the OSF today.

Free and easy to use, the Open Science Framework supports the entire research lifecycle: planning, execution, reporting, archiving, and discovery.

Create an Account Learn More Hide this message