Main content

Registered Reports: A Method to Increase the Credibility of Published Reports

  0
Affiliated institutions: University of Virginia, Center For Open Science

Date created: | Last Updated:

: DOI | ARK

Creating DOI. Please wait...

Create DOI

Category: Project

Description: From abstract: Ignoring replications and negative results is bad for science. This special issue presents a novel publishing format – Registered Reports – as a partial solution.

Wiki

Add important information, links, or images here to describe your project.

Files

Citation

Components

Replications of Important Results in Social Psychology: Special Issue of Social Psychology

Nosek & Lakens
Fifteen Registered Reports that had peer review prior to data collection
Recent Activity

Registered Reports

Chambers, Banks, Bishop & 18 more
A research publishing format in which protocols and analysis plans are peer reviewed and registered prior to data collection, then published regardles...
Recent Activity

Tags

Recent Activity

OSF does not support the use of Internet Explorer. For optimal performance, please switch to another browser.
Accept
This website relies on cookies to help provide a better user experience. By clicking Accept or continuing to use the site, you agree. For more information, see our Privacy Policy and information on cookie use.
Accept
×

Start managing your projects on the OSF today.

Free and easy to use, the Open Science Framework supports the entire research lifecycle: planning, execution, reporting, archiving, and discovery.

Copyright © 2011-2024 Center for Open Science | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Status | API
TOP Guidelines | Reproducibility Project: Psychology | Reproducibility Project: Cancer Biology