Main content

Contributors:

Date created: | Last Updated:

: DOI | ARK

Creating DOI. Please wait...

Create DOI

Category: Project

Description: Past research suggests that contextual factors such as transitioning across wealth levels may affect people’s distributive preferences. In the current study, I explored this question by investigating distributive preferences in a Dictator Game (DG) setting. To induce external inequality between players separate from the DG context, I distributed extra bonus money or ‘wealth’ to players. I investigated if distributive preferences in a DG differ for individuals who experience increases in their wealth level (transitioners) as compared to individuals who stay at a stable wealth level. Additionally, I examined whether transitioners give more to less wealthy recipients compared to non-transitioners, and whether transitions and non-transitioners differ in their preferences as a function of whether their wealth was acquired via merit or luck. Results from 124 participants suggested that transitioners do not significantly differ from non-transitioners with regard to distributive preferences. This might be because the effects of income transitioning only manifest if individuals spend considerable time in a particular wealth level or because there are other mechanisms at play. Future studies may yield results more in line with theory by featuring designs that effectively capture the effect of transitioning across wealth levels.

Files

Loading files...

Citation

Components

No components to display.

Recent Activity

Loading logs...

OSF does not support the use of Internet Explorer. For optimal performance, please switch to another browser.
Accept
This website relies on cookies to help provide a better user experience. By clicking Accept or continuing to use the site, you agree. For more information, see our Privacy Policy and information on cookie use.
Accept
×

Start managing your projects on the OSF today.

Free and easy to use, the Open Science Framework supports the entire research lifecycle: planning, execution, reporting, archiving, and discovery.