Main content

Date created: | Last Updated:

: DOI | ARK

Creating DOI. Please wait...

Create DOI

Category: Project

Description: While prior studies have shown that monolingual infants can use transitional probabilities to segment words by 8 months of age (e.g., Saffran et al., 1996), less is known about how exposure to dialectal variation impacts this ability. The present study addresses this gap by examining how such variability influences word segmentation in 9-month-old Norwegian-learning infants. Specifically, three research questions were posed: (1) Do 9-month-old infants demonstrate statistical learning by segmenting words based on transitional probabilities? (2) Does exposure to two dialects influence segmentation compared to exposure to one dialect? (3) Among bidialectal infants, does the degree of dialect similarity affect segmentation performance? To explore these questions, the study implemented a conceptual replication of Saffran et al.’s (1996) artificial language paradigm. A total of 79 Norwegian-learning infants (43 monodialectal, 36 bidialectal) were familiarized with a continuous stream of synthesized speech containing four trisyllabic “words” defined by transitional probabilities. Infants’ ability to segment the stream was assessed using an eye-tracking task, with differences in looking time between familiar and novel test items serving as an index of segmentation.

License: CC-By Attribution 4.0 International

Files

Files can now be accessed and managed under the Files tab.

Citation

Tags

Recent Activity

Loading logs...

OSF does not support the use of Internet Explorer. For optimal performance, please switch to another browser.
Accept
This website relies on cookies to help provide a better user experience. By clicking Accept or continuing to use the site, you agree. For more information, see our Privacy Policy and information on cookie use.
Accept
×

Start managing your projects on the OSF today.

Free and easy to use, the Open Science Framework supports the entire research lifecycle: planning, execution, reporting, archiving, and discovery.