Main content

Home

Menu

View
Wiki Version:
The rationale behind this study was that the low norm may not have been low enough. Therefore, we presented an even lower norm (.14 cents) and ran participants in a 2x2 (norm no-norm vs. speed delay) ANOVA. Under the full data model (no adjustment for passing the comprehension check), we found that participants adjusted their contributions to match the low norm; participants who saw a low norm donated less (24.463, SD = 16.32) than if they hadn't been told a norm (31.225, SD = 16.379; F(1, 290)=12.607, *p*<.001). We also replicated the speed effect with participants deciding quickly donating more (29.798, SD = 16.351) than if they waited to decide (25.889, SD = 16.335; F(1,290)=4.216, *p*<.041). However, once again, the sought after interaction was nowhere near statistical significance (*p* > .957).
OSF does not support the use of Internet Explorer. For optimal performance, please switch to another browser.
Accept
This website relies on cookies to help provide a better user experience. By clicking Accept or continuing to use the site, you agree. For more information, see our Privacy Policy and information on cookie use.
Accept
×

Start managing your projects on the OSF today.

Free and easy to use, the Open Science Framework supports the entire research lifecycle: planning, execution, reporting, archiving, and discovery.

Copyright © 2011-2024 Center for Open Science | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Status | API
TOP Guidelines | Reproducibility Project: Psychology | Reproducibility Project: Cancer Biology