### Many Labs 1:
#### [Click here to expand this wiki and read more.][1]
**Access the [full-size figure][2], [data][3], [preregistered protocol][4], and [final manuscript][5] in [files][6]. See also the [erratum][7].**<br />
<img src="https://osf.io/9fs5i/download" />
Notes:
**Erratum** correcting the effect size for allowed/forbidden (among other issues) is [published here][8].
**Updated stats** for [ML.web.Supplement.pdf][9] made on 10/19/2017 fixing incorrect numbers for Anchoring and Adjustment. Thanks to Uri Simonsohn for discovering these errors.
Notes: “X” indicates the effect sizes obtained in the original studies. Large circles represent the aggregate effect sizes obtained across all participants. Error bars represent 99% noncentral confidence intervals around the effects. Small circles represent the effect sizes obtained within each site (grey and green circles for US and international replications, respectively).
**Index:**
- [Methods and Materials][10] used in the replications.
- [Mock session videos][11] of experimental sessions.
- [Site and Sample Characteristics][12] documenting the context of the different data collection sites.
- [Open Datasets][13]
- [Analytic scripts and output][14]
- [Overall summary results, and results per each site][15].
- [Our response to the commentaries][16], and data/results from follow-up investigations prompted by the commentaries (mostly relating to Anchoring and Adjustment).
**Links to original articles that provide the studies for this replication effort:**
<a href="http://peoplescience.org/sites/default/files/OppenheimerMeyvisDavidenko.2009.pdf">Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power</a> (Oppenheimer et al., 2009)
<a href="http://psych.hanover.edu/classes/cognition/papers/tversky81.pdf">The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice</a> (Tversky & Kahneman, 1981)
<a href="http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/1996-24980-001">Measures of anchoring in estimation tasks</a> (Jacowitz & Kahneman, 1995)
<a href="http://journal.sjdm.org/9609/jdm9609.pdf">The retrospective gambler’s fallacy: Unlikely events, constructing the past, and multiple universes</a> (Oppenheimer & Monin, 2009)
<a href="http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/articles/5414342/response-scales-effects-category-range-reported-behavior-comparative-judgments">Response scales: Effects of category range on reported behavior and comparative judgments</a> (Schwarz et al., 1985)
The current status of American public opinion (Hyman & Sheatsley, 1950)
<a href="https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/suelima/labreport1/rugg1941.pdf">Experiments in wording questions: II</a> (Rugg, 1941)
<a href="http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/1937-04240-001">Prestige, suggestion, and attitudes</a> (Lorge & Curtiss, 1936)
<a href="http://pss.sagepub.com/content/early/2011/07/08/0956797611414726">A single exposure to the American flag shifts support toward Republicanism up to 8 months later</a> (Carter et al., 2011; Study 2)
<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22774789">Mere exposure to money increases endorsement of free-market systems and social inequality</a> (Caruso et al., 2012)
<a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022103110001307">Elaboration enhances the imagined contact effect</a> (Husnu & Crisp, 2010, Study 1)
<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12088131">Math = Male, Me = Female, therefore Math ≠ Me</a> (Nosek, Banaji, & Greenwald, 2002)
[1]: https://osf.io/wx7ck/wiki/home/
[2]: https://osf.io/9fs5i/
[3]: https://osf.io/pqf9r/
[4]: https://osf.io/abesq/
[5]: https://osf.io/ebmf8/
[6]: https://openscienceframework.org/project/WX7Ck/files/
[7]: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2019-34530-002
[8]: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2019-34530-002
[9]: https://osf.io/y36m8/
[10]: https://osf.io/xvpu3/
[11]: https://osf.io/t6a3n/
[12]: https://osf.io/cmi6b/
[13]: https://osf.io/pqf9r/
[14]: https://osf.io/7rzan/
[15]: https://osf.io/rn4ue/
[16]: https://osf.io/v89rn/
