## June 10th 2016 ## Detailed scan notes from June 9, 2016: > Runs 1-4 no problem. Run 5 (attempt 1) crash at 75% data collected Run > 5 recollected OK Run 6 (attempt 1) crash at ~20% data collected Rest > of the scan was aborted after this > > Subject HERO_mxs1 reported excessive heat so we should probably > rethink how we block the bore. > > Eye tracking was fine, subject seemed awake. > > Subject reports 1 false alarm in run 1. Because the scan was aborted at run 5, we have 3 more scan runs to complete data collection from subject MXS. Thus, we have the following addendum to the registration: The plan is to use the 5 runs from June 9th plus 3 more collected on June 10th, we will add an addendum to the pre-registration document explaining the rationale for this change (see above scan notes). In the addendum we will note that no data from yesterday or today’s sessions were analyzed before deciding what to analyze. ## May 30th 2016 ## Addendum 01 written and uploaded by MS to 1) clarify the stopping rule for data collection, and 2) remove whole-brain analysis from the *Planned analyses** section as this is no longer relevant. ## May 27th 2016 ## Preregistration document uploaded by JR. Registration created by JR. Data not yet collected. First subject will be collected at 8:00 a.m. ---------- 8 Runs were successfully acquired from subject hero_asb1. Unfortunately, Randomized Fiber Optic Cable C was irreparibly damaged when the table came out of the scanner. This halted data collection and prevent us from acquiring post-scan validation of the stimuli. We had planned on keeping the data and using the pre-scan validation values until we discovered that some of the anterior gradient coils had become disabled during the scan. This change has led us to discard the data collected during the first session. These data will not be analyzed and the subject will be asked to return for a second session.