Main content

Blinded versus unblinded review: A field study on the equity of peer-review processes

  0

Date created: | Last Updated:

: DOI | ARK

Creating DOI. Please wait...

Create DOI

Category: Project

Description: Pre-registration, material, data, and analyses for paper comparing single- and double-blind review at the 39th Annual SJDM Meeting.

License: MIT License

Wiki

Add important information, links, or images here to describe your project.

Files

Files can now be accessed and managed under the Files tab.

Citation

Components

Handbook Modeling

Pleskac
This component has the code and data for modeling the text.
Recent Activity

Reliability and Fairness Analyses

Pleskac, Kyung, Chapman & 1 more
This component has a detailed summary of the statistics and analyses used to evaluate the reliability and bias in the study. Includes R code and outpu...
Recent Activity

Validity Analyses

Pleskac, Kyung, Chapman & 1 more
Analyses examining the predictive validity of the review ratings and the characteristics.
Recent Activity

Survey Data and Analyses

Pleskac, Kyung, Chapman & 1 more
Analyses of the survey data on preferences and perceptions.
Recent Activity

Recent Activity

OSF does not support the use of Internet Explorer. For optimal performance, please switch to another browser.
Accept
This website relies on cookies to help provide a better user experience. By clicking Accept or continuing to use the site, you agree. For more information, see our Privacy Policy and information on cookie use.
Accept
×

Start managing your projects on the OSF today.

Free and easy to use, the Open Science Framework supports the entire research lifecycle: planning, execution, reporting, archiving, and discovery.

Copyright © 2011-2025 Center for Open Science | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Status | API
TOP Guidelines | Reproducibility Project: Psychology | Reproducibility Project: Cancer Biology