Home

Menu

Loading wiki pages...

View
Wiki Version:
<p>Posters at conferences are vital to conveying scientific information between researchers. However, many critique the traditional format, which divides the poster into relatively equal sections (e.g., Introduction, Methods), for being text-heavy. The “better poster” was developed in response to this concern. The poster’s center is devoted to the main conclusion with other elements (e.g., statistical tests) on its sides. Though this format does reduce the quantity of text, the focus on the primary conclusion may reduce the viewer’s tendency to analyze its credibility, which is an important feature of research conferences. Advanced psychology undergraduates studied six posters presenting research from various areas of psychology using either the traditional or “better poster” format. Each poster had a major error that would affect the credibility of the conclusion (e.g., causal claim from a correlation). After viewing each, participants listed the main takeaways of the research, what it did well, and observed errors. This study has important implications for scientific communication, particularly the role of poster format in the comprehension and evaluation of scientific research.</p>
OSF does not support the use of Internet Explorer. For optimal performance, please switch to another browser.
Accept
This website relies on cookies to help provide a better user experience. By clicking Accept or continuing to use the site, you agree. For more information, see our Privacy Policy and information on cookie use.
Accept
×

Start managing your projects on the OSF today.

Free and easy to use, the Open Science Framework supports the entire research lifecycle: planning, execution, reporting, archiving, and discovery.