Main content

Home

Menu

Loading wiki pages...

View
Wiki Version:
During a large lecture class (300+ students), we used a polling and live quiz tool called Socrative (www.socrative.com) to engage students in the lecture and test their knowledge on the topics covered. The "Test your peer-review knowledge" exercise asked two questions of the class regarding peer-review: 1. What **don't** peer reviewers look for during the peer-review process? 2. In 2013, what percentage of scholarly articles submitted to Nature were actually published?* Socrative allowed us, and the class, to see the students' anonymous answers and discuss them. We then followed up this exercise with a Q&A session with the faculty in the room. Faculty answered a number of questions about their experience with the peer-review process, from both the reviewer and author perspective. See [the questions and slide prompts][1] for more details. *See [Nature's annual acceptance rates][2] on their website for this information. [1]: https://osf.io/5fwmp/ [2]: https://www.nature.com/nature/for-authors/editorial-criteria-and-processes
OSF does not support the use of Internet Explorer. For optimal performance, please switch to another browser.
Accept
This website relies on cookies to help provide a better user experience. By clicking Accept or continuing to use the site, you agree. For more information, see our Privacy Policy and information on cookie use.
Accept
×

Start managing your projects on the OSF today.

Free and easy to use, the Open Science Framework supports the entire research lifecycle: planning, execution, reporting, archiving, and discovery.