Main content

Summaries of harms in systematic reviews are unreliable (Part 2 of 2): Given the same data sources, systematic reviews of gabapentin have different results for harms

  0
Contributors:
  4. Mara McAdams-DeMarco
  5. Eliseo Guallar

Date created: | Last Updated:

: DOI | ARK

Creating DOI. Please wait...

Create DOI

Category: Project

Description: Article 3 of a three-part series on synthesis of harms, submitted to Journal of Clinical Epidemiology.

Files

Files can now be accessed and managed under the Files tab.

Citation

Recent Activity

Unable to retrieve logs at this time. Please refresh the page or contact support@osf.io if the problem persists.

OSF does not support the use of Internet Explorer. For optimal performance, please switch to another browser.
Accept
This website relies on cookies to help provide a better user experience. By clicking Accept or continuing to use the site, you agree. For more information, see our Privacy Policy and information on cookie use.
Accept
×

Start managing your projects on the OSF today.

Free and easy to use, the Open Science Framework supports the entire research lifecycle: planning, execution, reporting, archiving, and discovery.

Copyright © 2011-2025 Center for Open Science | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Status | API
TOP Guidelines | Reproducibility Project: Psychology | Reproducibility Project: Cancer Biology