Main content

Home

Menu

Loading wiki pages...

View
Wiki Version:
**Project** Zettersten, M., & Saffran, J. (in press). Sampling to learn words: Adults and children sample words that reduce referential ambiguity. Developmental Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.13064 **Abstract:** How do learners gather new information during word learning? One possibility is that learners selectively sample items that help them reduce uncertainty about new word meanings. In a series of cross-situational word learning tasks with adults and children, we manipulated the referential ambiguity of label-object pairs experienced during training and subsequently investigated which words participants chose to sample additional information about. In our first experiment, adult learners chose to receive additional training on object-label associations that reduce referential ambiguity during cross-situational word learning. This ambiguity-reduction strategy was related to improved test performance. In two subsequent experiments, we found that, at least in some contexts, children (3-8 years of age) show a similar preference to seek information about words experienced in ambiguous word learning situations. In Experiment 2, children did not preferentially select object-label associations that remained ambiguous during cross-situational word learning. However, in a third experiment that increased the relative ambiguity of two sets of novel object-label associations, we found evidence that children preferentially make selections that reduce ambiguity about novel word meanings. These results carry implications for understanding how children actively contribute to their own language development by seeking information that supports learning. **Repository materials:** - **analysis:** Folder containing analysis scripts (commented R script and an R markdown file covering the same analyses) - **data:** Folder containing experimental data along with a codebook - **experiment_scripts:** Folder containing the html/javascript scripts for all experiments reported in the manuscript. "version1" corresponds to Experiment 1. "version2" corresponds to Experiment S1 (supplementary material). "version3" corresponds to Experiment 2. "version4" corresponds to Experiment 3. - **figures:** Figures generated during the analyses **Analysis Walkthrough** Here is a direct link to the html rendering of the R Markdown file in the analysis folder. This provides a walkthrough of the major analyses in the paper. https://mzettersten.github.io/crossAct/analysis/Crossact.html **GitHub** https://github.com/mzettersten/crossAct
OSF does not support the use of Internet Explorer. For optimal performance, please switch to another browser.
Accept
This website relies on cookies to help provide a better user experience. By clicking Accept or continuing to use the site, you agree. For more information, see our Privacy Policy and information on cookie use.
Accept
×

Start managing your projects on the OSF today.

Free and easy to use, the Open Science Framework supports the entire research lifecycle: planning, execution, reporting, archiving, and discovery.