Main content

Home

Menu

Loading wiki pages...

View
Wiki Version:
**ABSTRACT** Doctors are placed under significant pressure to engage in research for career progression. Our review suggests that research selection criteria for specialty training programs incentivise high-volume, CV-padding research, focusing on quantity and authorship position over research quality. These selection criteria may be unintended drivers of research waste. **PUBLICATION** Withers, C., Noble, C., Brandenburg, C., Glasziou, P.P. and Stehlik, P. (2021), Selection criteria for Australian and New Zealand medical specialist training programs: another under-recognised driver of research waste. Med J Aust. https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.51250
OSF does not support the use of Internet Explorer. For optimal performance, please switch to another browser.
Accept
This website relies on cookies to help provide a better user experience. By clicking Accept or continuing to use the site, you agree. For more information, see our Privacy Policy and information on cookie use.
Accept
×

Start managing your projects on the OSF today.

Free and easy to use, the Open Science Framework supports the entire research lifecycle: planning, execution, reporting, archiving, and discovery.