Main content

Date created: | Last Updated:

: DOI | ARK

Creating DOI. Please wait...

Create DOI

Category: Project

Description: Does the comparative format (explicitly comparative, implicitly comparative; further shortened to format: explicit, implicit) of claims about men and women and about younger and older people affect observers’ judgments of the claims’ truth and acceptability? Is the format effect moderated by the claims’ stereotype-consistency (stereotypical, counter-stereotypical) and valence (positive, negative)? Participants will judge the truth, acceptability, familiarity, stereotypicality, and positivity of claims about social groups. The claims will be either (a) superficially non-comparative, but imply an intergroup difference, and hence will be called implicit differences here, or (b) explicitly comparative and denoting a difference, and hence will be called explicit differences here. In addition, they will be either stereotypical or counter-stereotypical.

Files

Files can now be accessed and managed under the Files tab.

Citation

Recent Activity

Loading logs...

OSF does not support the use of Internet Explorer. For optimal performance, please switch to another browser.
Accept
This website relies on cookies to help provide a better user experience. By clicking Accept or continuing to use the site, you agree. For more information, see our Privacy Policy and information on cookie use.
Accept
×

Start managing your projects on the OSF today.

Free and easy to use, the Open Science Framework supports the entire research lifecycle: planning, execution, reporting, archiving, and discovery.