Study 2 ------- The protocol for the first study in this Registered Replication Report on the Verbal Overshadowing Effect included a potentially important discrepancy from the original procedure of Study 1 in Schooler & Engstler-Schooler (1990). Specifically, the order of the description task and the crossword puzzle filler task were reversed, meaning that there was a delay between the description phase and the recognition phase in the replication study but not in the original. That ordering mimicked Study 4 of the original paper, which showed a roughly comparable overshadowing effect to the original Study 1. But, some verbal overshadowing studies that included a delay between the description phase and the test phase showed a reduced overshadowing effect. This followup study is designed to verify the size of the verbal overshadowing effect using the original task ordering from Study 1 of Schooler & Engstler-Schooler (1990). It will allow an assessment of the verbal overshadowing effect with the original ordering of Study 1 and will also allow a comparison between studies to determine whether ordering affects the size of the verbal overshadowing effect. The protocol is identical to that of the first RRR study except that the order of the description task and crossword puzzle filler task are reversed. Participants first view the bank robbery video. They then compete the 20-minute crossword puzzle filler task. Next they either describe the bank robber (experimental condition) or name countries and capitals (control condition). Finally, they complete the recognition task. Other than this change in ordering, the protocol for the followup study is identical to that of the first study. Our laboratory made the following changes to our implementation of the design: 1. The sample size and demographics for Study 2 will be identical to that used in Study 1, however, our method for recruiting participants will be different. In Study 1, we recruited participants via the undergraduate subject pool (and they received course credit for participation) and via poster advertisements around campus (and they received £3 for participation). In Study 2, we will recruit participants from across the Warwick University campus using SONA—an existing electronic participant pool system. All participants will be paid £3 for their participation. **Minor amendment made on 2014-02-11:** After recruiting 50 participants solely using the SONA subject panel at Warwick University, we decided to recruit participants from the same general population using poster advertisements around campus as well. We did this because we were finding it difficult to recruit White participants aged 18-25 years via SONA. All other aspects of the procedure remained the same.