Comparing quality of reporting between preprints and peer-reviewed articles in the biomedical literature

Clarissa França Dias Carneiro; Victor Gabriel De Souza Queiroz; Thiago C Moulin; Olavo Bohrer Amaral

doi:None

Comparing quality of reporting between preprints and peer-reviewed articles in the biomedical literature

Contributors:

Date created: 2017-11-17 11:43 AM | Last Updated: 2024-05-07 01:49 PM

Category: Project

Description: In this project we aim to compare an objective dimension of research quality, completeness of reporting, between articles published as preprints and as peer-reviewed articles in the life sciences.

License: CC-By Attribution 4.0 International

Projects
Registrations

Included in Metascience's Collection

Type: Research

Status: Active

Files

Files can now be accessed and managed under the Files tab.

Citation

Recent Activity

Unable to retrieve logs at this time. Please refresh the page or contact support@osf.io if the problem persists.

OSF does not support the use of Internet Explorer. For optimal performance, please switch to another browser.

This website relies on cookies to help provide a better user experience. By clicking Accept or continuing to use the site, you agree. For more information, see our Privacy Policy and information on cookie use.

Start managing your projects on the OSF today.

Free and easy to use, the Open Science Framework supports the entire research lifecycle: planning, execution, reporting, archiving, and discovery.

Create an Account Learn More Hide this message

Main content

Links to this project

Comparing quality of reporting between preprints and peer-reviewed articles in the biomedical literature

Link other OSF projects

Files

Citation

Recent Activity

Start managing your projects on the OSF today.