Strauch, C.*, Hoogerbrugge, A.J.*, Baer, G., Hooge, I.T., Nijboer, T.W., Stuit, S., & Van der Stigchel, S. (2023). Saliency models perform best for women's and young adults' fixations. *Communications Psychology*. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44271-023-00035-8
-----
**DATA UPDATE**
28/11/2023
We uploaded additional data:
*n* total = 6,909
Subset with valid demographics:
*n* = 4,173
*M* Age = 30.2, *SD* = 11.64
Women = 1,803; 43.21%
Men = 2,370; 56.79%
Results update relative to the paper (replication attempts and outcomes; yes/no):
1) Consistent overall model benchmark - same rank order (y)
therefore: most models outperform central bias, some models outperform meaning map (y)
3) No gender bias anymore, models perform non significantly different for women/men (n)
4) Consistent age biases: better model performances for young adults (y)
5) Consistent age biases: better model performances for deviations between Consistent findings across fixations age bins (y)
6) Consistent age biases: better model performances for deviations between age bins scaled with maximally achievable NSS (y)
7) Consistent findings across fixations (y)
8) Consistent findings across fixations for absolute NSS per nth fixation (y)
9) Consistent findings across fixations for NSS scaled with maximally achievable NSS (y)
---
If you use data or code published here, please cite the paper given above.
For any questions regarding code and data, please reach out to the corresponding authors:
c.strauch@uu.nl
and/or
a.j.hoogerbrugge@uu.nl
