Main content

Home

Menu

View
Wiki Version:
In this article, I try to show that although the religious and intellectual movements now known as “Reformation” introduced potentially “revolutionary” ideas, even in the realm of political thinking and action, no revolution did actually take place, not least because of the victory of a “normalization impulse”, so to speak. After considering (only) two amongst the most innovative of those ideas, I briefly address the socalled “Radical Reformation”, moving thereafter to a discussion of Stefan Zweig’s Castellio gegen Calvin (1936), in which the Author tries to show the ambivalent character of the Reformation and its ideas – what I have called the “dark side” of the Reformation –, especially when it comes to the issue of the exercise of power, dangerously shifting from (at least potential) revolution to authoritarianism and even tyranny.
OSF does not support the use of Internet Explorer. For optimal performance, please switch to another browser.
Accept
This website relies on cookies to help provide a better user experience. By clicking Accept or continuing to use the site, you agree. For more information, see our Privacy Policy and information on cookie use.
Accept
×

Start managing your projects on the OSF today.

Free and easy to use, the Open Science Framework supports the entire research lifecycle: planning, execution, reporting, archiving, and discovery.

Copyright © 2011-2024 Center for Open Science | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Status | API
TOP Guidelines | Reproducibility Project: Psychology | Reproducibility Project: Cancer Biology